|
 |
It is well
known that light transports energy. But photons, the quanta
of light, additionally carry momentum. By using this momentum
of
light it
becomes possible to move small particles like viruses, cells, or
micromechanical objects. Light, which interacts with an object
generally
is deflected. In the ray-optical model this deflection is described by
reflection and refraction. Deflection of the photons leads to a change
in momentum for the photons since the heading of the photons
change. Due to the momentum conservation principle there has to be an
opposed
change in momentum of the object that interacted with
the photons. Change in momentum (per time) leads to force. For every
incident ray onto an object we, therefore, can compute the force acting
on the object. An integration of all rays focused onto a transparent
object (e.g. a glass sphere) leads to a resulting force that pushes
the object towards the focus of the light field.
In a conventional optical trap one focused spot is controlled by
mirrors or accusto-optical deflectors in order to move objects.
Holographic optical tweezers (HOT) however use another approach for
generating
the trapping field. Fig. 1 shows the principle setup which is based on
a conventional microscope consisting of a microscope objective, a tube
lens and a camera.
The laser that is used for trapping is coupled into the microscope
objective by a beam splitter and a telescope. We now introduce a
spatial light modulator (SLM), typically a high resolution liquid
crystal display (LCD), into a plane conjugate to the pupil of the
microscope objective. The light field directly behind the SLM,
therefore is Fourier transformed by the microscope
objective. In other words: The intensity distribution in the object
plane corresponds to the intensity of the Fourier transform of the
hologram displayed by
the SLM. By changing the hologram the light field in the object plane
is changed instantaneously.
In order to compute the holograms in video-realtime we preferably use
the graphics processing unit (GPU) of consumer graphics boards that are
normally used for gaming.
Compared to conventional tweezers we have the following properties
for a HOT system: - No mechanical
moving parts
- Highly accurate 3D control of the
traps (below 5 nm)
- Trapping
potentials optimized for specific specimen
- Independent
movement and rotation of several objects
in 3D simultaneously (see below)
- Possibility
to correct for aberrations (see below)
- Reduced
light efficiency
- Increased
computational load
- Possibility
to trap at reduced
numerical apertures
(see below)

Fig. 1: Schematic
setup of a Holographic Optical Tweezers
system.
Movement of the
trapped objects is achieved by moving the reconstructed
spot via a change of the hologram. For lateral movement a phase wedge
is added to the hologram. Axial movement is obtained by adding a
quadratic phase term to the hologram. More sophisticated computation of
the holograms is possible by using optimizing hologram algorithms.
Rotation of micro-objects by light can be realized
by direct
transfer of angular momentum but for large particles (diameter above 2
microns) we prefer a multispot technique as shown in Fig. 2. Here,
two (or more) spots are used for trapping one object (in Fig. ??? a
yeast cell). By controlling the relative position of the traps one can
rotate non-symmetric objects in a controlled way.
Fig. 2: Rotation of
a
yeast cell with two independant traps.
Typically,
wavelengths in the near-infrared region are used for
trapping because the potential harm to the specimen due to the strongly
focused radiation is minimum in this spectral region. With HOT
it
is anyway possible to reduce the concentration of light - and therefore
potential harm - for
large particles like cells, by homogeneously illuminating the whole
object. Sometimes, on the other hand, one wants to destroy or
cut
objects. In this case operation is best performed in the ultraviolet
spectral region, as light in this region is absorbed by biological
materials.
Here, unfortunately liquid crystal- based SLMs are no option and
micromechanical-based modulators have to be used, like i.e.
the
Digital Micromirror Device by Texas Instruments.
Fig. 3: Hybridoma cell and polystyrene bead a) both
trapped, b)
hybridoma cell cut with a holographic scalpel and c) bead insert in cut
cell. This experiment was performed with a combined setup of HOT and
holographic scalpel.
The imaging of biological specimen often is
degraded by
aberrations due to the specimen itself. Most noticeable are spherical
aberrations due to a refractive index mismatch. Of course such
aberrations that reduce the resolution of optical imaging also might
lead to problems for optical trapping. This is directly obvious when
trapping of small (in the range of 1 lambda) objects is
required. Compared to conventional traps
the HOT can easily
correct such aberrations. To this end one just has to incorporate the
phase-conjugate of the aberration into the hologram. Different methods
have been implemented in the past to first measure the aberrations and
then correct them with the SLM. By this approach the Strehl ratio of
the generated light field - and therefore the trapping efficiency -
increases.  |  |
Fig. 4:
a)
aberrated trap, b.)
corrected trap
(images were taken at the same exposure time) |
Fig.
5: corrected (top) and
uncorrected (bottom) images of spherical beads obtained with the
imaging system of a HOT
system |
Three-dimensional
optical trapping with a single optical system
normally is only possible for high numerical aperture (NA) because with
medium or low NA there is strong forward scattering force that pushes
the object out of the trap. Typically, immersion at numerical
apertures above 1.0 are used. Such high NA systems unfortunately lead
to a small working distance and a small depth of focus.
The holographic approach allows one to overcome these limitations by
the so-called "Twin Trap" approach. Here, we use simultaneously two
traps to trap one object. The two traps are located at different axial
positions (see Fig. 6). The lower trap is reflected at the (dichroit)
object plate. Therefore two counterpropagating beams are generated,
which are brought to focus in the same position in the object volume.
By this approach, the forward scattering
forces of the two traps, which normally pushes the objects out of the
traps, cancel each other and stable 3D-trapping is achieved.
 |  |
Fig. 6:Principle
of the twin trap: two
axially separated traps are
holographically generated. The focus of the second trap
lies — after
reflection at the object slide — at the focus of the first
trap.
(images were taken at the same exposure time) |
Fig.
7: Stable axial trapping with a twin
trap (a). By turning off the reflected trap, the bead is pushed out of
the focus (b) towards the
reflecting object slide (c), shown here by defocusing the microscope.
|
References
of our group concerning
HOT |
[1] | Reicherter,
M.; Haist, T.; Wagemann,
E.U.and Tiziani, HJ, "
Optical particle trapping with computer-generated holograms written on
a liquid-crystal display", Optics Letters, 1999 , 24 ,
608-610 | [2] | Liesener,
J.; Reicherter, M.; Haist,
T. and Tiziani, H., "
Multi-functional optical tweezers using computer-generated holograms
", Optics Communications, 2000 , 185 , 77-82 |
[3] | Reicherter, M.; Liesener, J.; Haist,
T. and Tiziani, H., "
Advantages of holographic optical tweezers",SPIE, 2003 , 5143
,
76-83 | [4] | Reicherter,
M.; Gorski, W.; Haist,
T. and Osten, W. , "
Dynamic correction of aberrations in microscopic imaging systems using
an artificial point source",SPIE, 2004 , 5462 , 68-78
| [5] | Reicherter,
M.; Haist, T.; Zwick, S.; Burla, A.; Seifert, L., „Fast
hologram
computation and aberration control for holographic tweezers“,
Proc.
SPIE 5930, pp. 501-509 (2005) | [6] | Haist,
T., Reicherter, M., Burla, A., Seifert, L., Hollis, M., Osten, W.,
„Fast hologram computation for holographic tweezers", Proc.
Fringe
2005, pp. 126-133 (2005). | [7] | Reicherter
. M., Zwick, S., Haist, T., Kohler, C., Osten, W, „Fast
digital
hologram generation and adaptive force measurement in LCD based
holographic tweezers", Applied Optics 45(5), pp. 888-896 (2006). |
[8]
| Haist,
T., Reicherter, M.,Min Wu,Seifert L., „Using Graphics Boards
to compute
holograms“, Computing in Science & Engineering -
January 2006, pp.
8.-14 (2006). | [9] | Haist, T., Zwick,
S., Warber, M., Osten, W., "Spatial Light Modulators - Versatile Tools
for holography", Journal of Holography and Speckle 3, pp.1-12 (2006) |
[10]
| Zwick, S.,
Warber,
M., Haist, T., Osten, W., "Realisation of a holographic microlaser
scalpel using a digital micro mirror device", Proc. SPIE 6616 (2007) |
| [11] | Hermerschmidt,
A., Krüger, S., Haist, T., Zwick, S., Warber, M., Osten,
W.,"Holographic optical tweezers with real-time hologram calculation
using a phase-only modulating LCOS-based SLM at 1064 nm", Proc. SPIE
6905 (2008) |
[12] |
Zwick,S., Haist,T., Miyamoto, Y., He,L., Warber,M., Hermerschmidt,A.,
Osten,W., "Holographic twin traps", J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 11 (2009) 034011 | | |
©
Institut für Technische Optik
| | |